montreal-fireworks.com 2025 Schedule Report Blog

Montreal Fireworks Forum

 | Home | Register | Search | Statistics |
Pyromusical Design Montreal Fireworks Forum / Pyromusical Design /  
 

Best Pyromusical Equipment

 
 
Page  Page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next »

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#1 | Posted: 15 Oct 2004 16:45 
I'm wondering if people experienced in pyromusicals can comment on the various electronic firing systems they've used, noting good thing and bad things. I'm looking to buy a system soon.

Also, what is the modern procedure for syncing with a radio station broadcast and how is the delay handled?

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#2 | Posted: 15 Oct 2004 17:23 
I think most digital firing system out there will all perform equally well under good conditions. The main difference between each other is mostly their resistance to abuse. This being said, I think the most robust system out there is pyrodigital. It has reliably fired shows in pouring rain, frigid weather (can you say -40??), and has always delivered for me. I also like the fact that it uses it's own, native FSK time code, wich is much more robust than traditionnal SMPTE time code used by most others. As fas as I know, FSK time code is the only one that can be sent over voice-grade lines without suffering any degradation. It can also be broadcasted using simple walkie-ralkies.

Syncing with a radio station is usually done by burning a time code track along with the music on an 8-track ADAT. That time code track is then used to keep the show in sync. It can be broadcasted to the firing site or you can use a dedicated hard line for it.

An easier way (and not as precise) is to run the show off an internal clock. You just have to fire the first cue manually, in sync with the music and the rest of the pre-programmed show just rolls along. Be sure to be on the beat on that first cue or the whole show will be out of sync!

A third way is to have some sort of cue prior to the music. In a section that the public will not hear. Let's say for example that you have a 5 minutes piece of music. Your recording could start with a countdown, 10-9-8, etc..., followed by 20 seconds of silence and your music would play from 0:30 until 5:30. The radio station DJ starts the music 30 seconds before the start of the show.That part of the music is not being broadcasted outside the studio. Your assistant {at the radio station) relays the countdown to you and your first cue is actually the "0" of the countdown, 20 seconds before the opening of the show. This is a dummy cue, not firing anything but starting the internal clock on the firing board. The radio station DJ now has 20 seconds to bring the faders up so that the public can hear the music, but not the countdown.

Hope this helps...

Pat

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#3 | Posted: 16 Oct 2004 10:27 
Thanks for the information Pat.

What happens if there is a delay between the radio broadcast and the timecode broadcast? For instance if the timecode is over phone lines and the music is over FM radio..... Is this usually neglible delay?

p.s. Do you own pyrodigital, and if so what version. I found a site that is advertising pyrodigital - just wondering if this is the latest version.

http://www.infinityvisions.com/pd_fm.htm

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#4 | Posted: 17 Oct 2004 15:47 
There is no delay if you use a radio link or a hard line. The only method that could give you problems is the use of mobile phones. These are known for buffering data on busy lines and that can induce some delay in the signal.

I do not own a PD system but I work for companies that do. Your web link is correct, infinity visions is the sole agent for the selling of PD gear. Whatever they sell will be the absolute latest version.

Regards,
Pat

Author multifan
Member 
#5 | Posted: 18 Oct 2004 14:50 
This reminds me of something I have been curious about. How was WECO able to synchronise their show with a live orchestra in such a precise way? Did they do it with sophisticated electronic gadgetry or very alert people pushing lots of buttons?

Author Smoke
Member 
#6 | Posted: 18 Oct 2004 15:31 
that's a very good question. I've always wondered how that was done. If it was live, it had to have been done differently. How exactly was it done this way?

Anybody know?

That's a veey good question, multifan.

Trav.

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#7 | Posted: 19 Oct 2004 07:07 
Hi i'm an Italian boy, sorry for my English... I know how it works the PyroDigit

Author Anonymous
Guest 
#8 | Posted: 19 Oct 2004 07:53 
Hi i'm an Italian boy, sorry for my English... I know how it works the PyroDigit system and I think that it is the best.
These photos was of the 2° PyroDigit meeting in Vallo della Lucania fair, in the south of Italy, (sorry for the big size of the file, but the quality is very high:
http://www.pippar82.altervista.org/vallo/IMG_2959.JPG
http://www.pippar82.altervista.org/vallo/IMG_2960.JPG
http://www.pippar82.altervista.org/vallo/IMG_2980.JPG
http://www.pippar82.altervista.org/vallo/IMG_2991.JPG

these effects were prepared by one guy in 4 hours with that system: http://www.pippar82.altervista.org/vallo/IMG_2943.JPG , for a total of 40*15 = 600 shots in a pyromusic show of 20 minutes.

Filippo

Author Lars
Member 
#9 | Posted: 19 Oct 2004 09:04 
Regarding WECO's sycronisation: I suppose they pre-recorded the track and programmed the timecode for this. Pahaps they had to adjust it a few times during the show, i don't know...

Lars

Author Smoke
Member 
#10 | Posted: 19 Oct 2004 19:52 
Lars,

I know what you mean. Everytime I think about their show, I always remember the risks that they took. It all worked so well and so perfect, that even if the slightest flaw, like weather cooperation in relation to the waterfall effect, it would not have worked out well. Plus the live orchestra was very authentic, but it was certainly difficult!

Regards,

Trav.

Author Dima Kobzar
Member 
#11 | Posted: 3 Nov 2004 17:09 
Hello!
Our company is producer for pyrotechnic equipment such as computer launching system, manual control panel and other

you can see some info about computer launching system in our website http://sherif.dp.ua/eng_pk10.php

Regards.

Author pippar82
Guest 
#12 | Posted: 4 Nov 2004 10:20 
Hi Dima Kobzar, I read the description of your system and I have some questions:
1) The system works also with the radio modem or only by cable?
2) There aren't image of the system because I don't find it in the site is only in Russian and I don't speak it?
3) The system is made up of a master module that control the other module?

Author Dima Kobzar
Member 
#13 | Posted: 4 Nov 2004 13:23 
Hello, Pippar82.

Sorry for my English .
1.Our system works only by cable yet. Now we developing a radio design.
2.Images i can sent to you by e-mail
3.Right, system is made up of a master module that control the other module

If you have any questions, you can ask me.

Author Smoke
Member 
#14 | Posted: 13 Nov 2004 08:16 
I still wonder how that live orchestra for Weco worked out so well. I mean, how does one prepare for that? How are you synchronized at the very moment? What of there was a technical difficulty? So many questions arise when one considers these factors. Everything had to be precise! Another thing was the weather!

Trav.

Author Dima Kobzar
Member 
#15 | Posted: 13 Nov 2004 13:08 
Here are images of our system http://sherif.dp.ua/eng_pk10.php

Page  Page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next » 
Pyromusical Design Montreal Fireworks Forum / Pyromusical Design /
 Best Pyromusical Equipment

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

 

  ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 

 
 
Montreal Fireworks Forum Powered by Simple Bulletin Board miniBB ®


  ⇑