Beautiful Summer weather continued to dwell over much of Eastern Canada, including here in Montreal, where maximum temperatures attained 30 C, along with late-evening values ranging between 23-25 C. Humidity levels remained borderline moderate-high through the evening, generating negligible humidex readings. Winds had also been coming out lightly from the NNW at 9 km/h, pushing the smoke gently to the left of the audience stationed at La Ronde (right for those on Notre-Dame).
The second debutante entrant (Sugyp of Switzerland) of the 2012 edition of the Montreal fireworks competition truly presented a fabulous and surprising display in its entirety, leaving many spectators of the rather large audience often excited by its common energetic nature, including a pleasing opening, and flamboyant low-level effects. I was frequently left astonished by the richness of color, particularly the bright mines (most notably the central series of yellow/orange mines at one point), accompanied by the large caliber shells occurring at mid to high-level. It was also very much a pleasure to see a good choice of effects used to represent different aspects of the employed soundtrack, such as the effective use of the rapidly rising girandolas, as well as the nautical shells. The musical selections themselves were mostly appropriate for the devised theme, and a selected few of the tracks were fairly enjoyable, especially in terms of how they had been synchronized with the fireworks at many points.
It is arguably true that many viewers were most captivated by the remote-controlled airplane (or pyroplane?) that made an appearance mid-way into the performance, where gasps of delight were a common occurrence when the pyroplane accomplished several flying feats that are most often seen during an air show! The plane also later released some pyrotechnics, leading to even more sounds of approval as the plane soon landed, bringing the segment to a very fulfilling close. Really, this was a great addition to this display (and the competition, as a whole) for representation (it also went well with the chosen soundtrack) and will, as stated by several members of this forum, be something unforgotten for the years to come. Luckily, though, the weather was cooperative for such an idea!
As expressed previously, my negatives for this display relate to redundancy. Most prominent was the repetitive firing scheme of shells at mid to high-level. As much as I, and much of the surrounding crowd, I’m sure, adore a display filled with frequent barrages of large caliber shells, this did take something away from the pyromusical design and creativity sectors, and perhaps the overall complexity of the show was subsequently reduced because of this. As a result, this appeared to have affected the interconnectedness of the music with the fireworks, as the subtle details of some of the soundtracks were not always accordingly emphasized.
In terms of the general design of the display, the theme was well portrayed through most of the musical selections. In addition, the dissection of the theme was useful for representing the intended chronology of aeronautics, helping to visualize the progress that has been made over the decades. As such, I thought that the thematic framework was well considered and structured in this regard. However, a more diversified selection of effects would have been appreciated to illustrate some of the key highlights that engendered several musical choices, though this was achieved to some extent, such as the girandolas representing a portion of the “Flight” soundtrack. Again, the frequent use of shells gave the impression that the show was sometimes a little on the simplistic side, as a fair number of segments appeared similarly represented. On a more minor note in relation to the theme, it was not clear to me when the display had segued from the “past” component to that of the “present” - this was more understood when the "present" gradually set the stage for the “future” sections of the display, although there were a couple of tracks where I did not fully comprehend the relevance to the” future” component of the theme. That said, I personally thought that the transitions in pace from one segment to the other (as well as during individual segments) were often elaborate, allowing the display to run fluidly. The music, again, was good, especially in relation to the theme, but it did not draw me into the display as much as, say, the Japanese show. Of course, the concluding piece was certainly powerful, along with great crescendo, but, as Enkil stated, it could have endured for a little longer!
Overall, this was certainly a fantastic, and, under several circumstances, a very memorable performance put on by Sugyp! Indeed, the team received many cheers of approval, mostly attributed to the many points of excitement, the pyroplane segment (which received strong, positive responses), and following the powerful finale. The show was also very original and offered some excellent innovative ideas in representing it. Certainly a contender for a Jupiter award this year, but, of course, it is still early in the competition.
Trav.
