montreal-fireworks.com 2025 Schedule Report Blog

Montreal Fireworks Forum

 | Home | Register | Search | Statistics |
2025 Display Reviews Montreal Fireworks Forum / 2025 Display Reviews /  
 

United States — Pyro Spectaculars reviews

 
Author Smoke
Member 
#1 | Posted: 24 Jul 2025 21:18 
Hi everyone,

Please post your reviews of the American display here!

Trav.

Author Norandois
Member 
#2 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 10:07 
At least if you'r not delete my post yesterday, what a shame

Author fireworksforum
Admin 
#3 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 10:34 
Norandois:
At least if you'r not delete my post yesterday, what a shame
Please just post your review of the show. I've sent you an email about the post I deleted.

Thanks!

Author Norandois
Member 
#4 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 13:30 
What impress me the most of this show was the sequence part with those ghost mine are just awesome and bright colors, very loud and beautifull shell and finale wasn't high as Canada, soundtrack was awesome, I expected a louder finale specially at the salute, other than that I not really see the show because of what mentioned in my earlier post.

Author fredbastien
Member 
#5 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 17:14 
Pyro Spectaculars made a bold move designing an entire show based on heavy metal music for its fourth appearance in Montréal (third time competing). This highly aerial performance featured great pyrotechnics and must have delighted the audience scattered among the various viewing points on the island of Montréal and the South Shore. From La Ronde, where I was present for the 250th time to watch an official display of the Montreal International Fireworks Competition, the perspective was different. This GOOD show seemed to have been designed without considering, to a certain extent, several of the competition's evaluation criteria.

The pyromusical design was a success on Rainbow in the Dark, perhaps the best tableau of the show, with the colors of the rainbow displayed in a wide range of products. While the musical rhythm was generally intense, it became serene with the third song, Planet Caravan, which paired well with candles of crackles and shells of falling leaves above. However, these moments were not representative of the display. I felt less like I was watching a pyromusical show and more like I was watching fireworks accompanied by music. From the very first seconds, at the start of Crazy Train, shells burst independently of the many elements of the soundtrack. The second part, set to Iron Man, began with a sequence of small, crackling white clouds from left to right of the third ramp. This sequence would have best illustrate the «crazy train» of life from the opening segment. Why not use bell-shaped shells or some kind of proximity special effect to illustrate the bells when they rang out in For Whom the Bell Tolls? As the tempo of the music slowed at the end of Epic, why not highlight the horsetails shooting up into the sky instead of adding loud shells that ruined this quiet moment?

The lack of harmony between the soundtrack and the pyrotechnics was also obvious in the imprecise synchronization. Most tableaux ended with the soundtrack gradually fading out. This should have been synchronized with products whose brightness decreased simultaneously. However, this was not the case. On numerous occasions, a final salvo of three or four shells was launched. Those ending with small clouds of falling leaves at the end of Panama overlapped with the beginning of Thunderstruck, as did the horsetails from Epic, which overlapped with Cult of Personality. At the beginning of other songs, the pyrotechnics were slow to start (there was a notable delay of about 12 seconds at the beginning of Symphony of Destruction). The last pieces launched at the end of Ace of Spades did not match the final notes. To close the finale, the ultimate volleys of whistles and shells occurred after the music had ended.

With a line-up of 19 songs, the design surely required careful selection of sound clips. My limited knowledge of the genre prevents me from fully appreciating it. However, with so many parts, I would have expected more varied transitions than fade-outs. Four of the songs were devoted exclusively to lasers, which were presented without integration with pyrotechnics this time. As with the Italian entrant's extravaganza, it would have been interesting to use some of these laser moments to guide the audience through the chosen theme. In this case, for example, they could have navigated through the subgenres or eras that have characterized heavy metal music.

In terms of technical design, it is paradoxical that Pyro Spectaculars did not use the fifth launch ramp. In 2001, the debut display of this competitor included, according to my notes from that time, fountains lit up from a rope stretched across part of the width of the lake, very close to the spectators. Paul's report mentions «fans of short duration gerbs, stretched out across the lake» in the 11th part (for the same tableau, the late journalist Georges Lamon described on his former webpage a «quai sur l'eau crachant ses feux»). Paul also reported that «a line of gold horizontal wheels close to the audience in the lake started to rotate and shoot up tourbillons» in the 15th part. This setup appears to be the precursor to the current fifth ramp! (The 5th ramp as we know it today was more clearly introduced by Atlas in 2003, but the idea to bring some pyrotechnics closer to the audience was there.) This year, without additional nautical products or small ground effects, such as fountains, gerbs, flares, or flames, the depth of the firing area was not emphasized. Several scenes featured candles, mines, and other products that lit up as soon as they began their ascent at a low altitude. However, it was essentially an aerial show in which two, three, or four specimens of a given type of shell burst before moving on to another type.

The American team seems to me to have been most successful in terms of the quality of the pyrotechnics. Although the patriotic blue-white-red trio was repeated, the colors were varied and very bright, especially in the rainbow-themed segment. In particular, the song «Caught Somewhere in Time» ended with several barrages of mines with three color changes. The shells varied in size and effect, including a few multi-break types. However, there was a lack of diversity: the electric comets, crossettes, and crackles, among others, were a bit repetitive.

My personal ranking so far:

1. PyroItaly (Italy)
2. Sugyp (Switzerland)
3. Great Sky Art (Japan)
4. Blue Star Pyrotechnics (Canada)
5. Pyro Spectaculars (United States)

It was a busy evening, with the largest attendance so far this summer. Traffic, including public transportation, was disrupted on Sainte-Hélène Island due to a concert by The Weeknd at Parc Jean-Drapeau. Environment Canada issued a warning about an hour before the show due to the risk of severe thunderstorms in the area. The death of Ozzy Osbourne, which occurred two days prior, was briefly acknowledged a few minutes after the Pyro Spectaculars crew was introduced and the U.S. national anthem was played. During this time, a larger proportion of the audience appeared to remain seated, though there were no audible boos where I was sitting. The lights on the Jacques Cartier Bridge and the Ferris wheel did not contribute to the countdown, probably due to the ongoing labor dispute between La Ronde and the stage technicians.

Fred

Author ArtiDan
Member 
#6 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 20:59 
It was time for LaRonde and its audience to be shaken by heavy metal. United States had the perfect test for Le Monstre's 40th anniversary: would it withstand this musical frenzy or would each of its beams collapse one after the other under the incessant tremors of the drums and the raging rhythms of the guitars?

I liked :
— Shells were absolutely awesome, very diversified, all shapes and style (go-getters, crossettes, color changing), often filling the whole available space. This was the signature of the whole show.
— Color changing mines and shells at the end of «Caught Somewhere in Time» were very nice.
— Rainbow in the Dark was pretty much the most emotional segment of the night with very rich colors.
— We were able to easily distinguish the use of ramp 4 with nice effects.
— Very nice mines on ramp 3, though their use was very limited.
— Intense finale.

I noticed :
— Soundtrack, with 19 songs, had strange musical arrangements. Maybe selecting fewer songs would have allowed for more emotional development?
— Fading out end of songs were sometime confusing because shells were still exploding. It wasn't clear if they were ending the song, or belonging to the next one.
— Many moments of emptiness at all levels, in particular ramp 3 which was not used to its usual full potential.
— During «Highway Star» first chorus, very nice synchronized effects on ramps 3 and 4, creating movement, but there was nothing on second chorus, it felt super empty. I didn't get that one.
— Synchronisation was not on point many times.
— Ramp 5 not used at all.

Personal thoughts
United States stayed true to their usual style: go big and strong! It was intense with a very wide variety of shells filling the sky entirely. A true feast for the eyes! The soundtrack, though, was not on point, severely lacking emotions. The countless empty moments in the sky cannot be ignored too. Full use of ramp 3 would have solved that easily, adding timing and precision to the display. After the show, Le Monstre was still intact. It's still good for several years. What a beast!

After 5 shows :
1) Italy
2) Japan
3) United States
4) Canada
5) Switzerland

Best soundtrack : Japan.

Very personal thoughts
I was surprised there were no Judas Priest song in the soundtrack. It's a legendary group and their singer's voice is unique. I was also surprised not hearing any energetic guitar solo during the show. This is a signature of Heavy Metal. Also, even if a Pantera song was present, we couldn't hear the signer's deep roaring voice.

Dan

Author ArtiDan
Member 
#7 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 21:06 
fredbastien:
From La Ronde, where I was present for the 250th time to watch an official display of the Montreal International Fireworks Competition
Fred,

250 this really is something !

It's always a pleasure to read all your detailed reviews.

I wish you at least another 250 for the future !

:)

Dan

Author fireworksforum
Admin 
#8 | Posted: 25 Jul 2025 22:04 
ArtiDan:
250 this really is something !
And I'm a few more than that ... I'll have to go through the list and count — but basically every show since the closing in 1995 and then a couple of missed ones due to working my own Canada shows in the mid 2000s. Hard to know how to count the special closing shows we had for a couple of years that were not real full shows.

Paul.

Author ArtiDan
Member 
#9 | Posted: 26 Jul 2025 10:11 
That's pretty amazing Paul !

Working on the field is another step, the real thing.

I prefer to watch and admire. It's less stressful ! ;)

Dan

Author fredbastien
Member 
#10 | Posted: 26 Jul 2025 11:00 
ArtiDan:
250 this really is something !

It's always a pleasure to read all your detailed reviews.

I wish you at least another 250 for the future !
Merci Daniel! Pendant longtemps, il y a eu 9 ou 10 feux par an. Au rythme actuel de 8 feux par année, il me faudrait au minimum 32 ans pour y parvenir. J'aurais près de 80 ans! Prenons cela une année à la fois!

fireworksforum:
Hard to know how to count the special closing shows we had for a couple of years that were not real full shows.
I count the «official» displays which I have attended inside the amusement park (but not necessarily in the bleachers). I don't count those I had seen from various locations along Notre-Dame street between 1985 and 1995. My first shows in the park were the French one in 1994 and the closing in 1995. Then all those since 1996.

By «official» displays, I mean those considered by the organizers when they make a statement about the number of shows. For instance, when former competition director Martyne Gagnon spoke during the ceremony before the opening display on July 2nd 2022, she stated that it was the 322th show. That count basically includes all in-competition, opening, and closing shows. The very short displays after the post-closing award ceremonies in 2009 and 2010, the 5-minute «Préludes» events presented in various Montréal districts in 2021, the post-pandemic pre-opening show in 2022 (initially scheduled in 2021), and the occasional Labor Day weekends special fireworks events do not count. The «Boy & Girl Bands» opening show cancelled in 2023 and postponed to 2024 is counted once. On that basis, the Pyro Spectaculars' performance was the 342th show since the beginning of the Montreal International Fireworks Competition in 1985. The 350th show shall be the 6th display of the 2026 line-up.

Fred

Author Smoke
Member 
#11 | Posted: 26 Jul 2025 13:33 
I would need to perform a serious count for myself (if I may join the thread hijacking briefly), but it would be difficult to provide a reliable one due to limited availability of 1990-1992 display listings to properly verify. We began attending in 1990 after being so flabbergasted (in a good way) by the German display, which was the first show for that year's competition. That was my very first show, and it was viewed from La Ronde! Thereafter, we quickly learned about Notre-Dame Street as being another very popular venue, and among other reasons, it grew into a tradition to view from there. As such, my first show from Notre-Dame Street was, as I remember, the Australian one that followed Germany that year. The display dates tended to be (much) earlier in those years, too.

Despite how much the shows have advanced over the years, the 90s always hold a more special place for me!

Trav.

Author Norandois
Member 
#12 | Posted: 26 Jul 2025 14:15 
ArtiDan

Working at montreal fireworks in the cleanup after show is something you defenetely dont want to do😅 that my first jobs ever, I see bunch of people from employment agency prefer to not work and was probably the few one are motivated to make sure the next day everything is well prepared for the other team. still pretty glad to being part of the technical crew back in the day, mixing school and see the show on jacques-cartier bridge and go right down to the ramp and waiting until 23hrs to be able to start the cleanup. Meet a lot of awesome people, if i can restart this I defenetely say yes ☺️

I'm not like paul and few guy see every show since the competition, but I started somewhere in 1997 as a young child, I do my best not miss a show, get up my rooftop in Longueuil to see the show far away. I just can't count how many plus all the display i've done too since I have my license somewhere 20 years already 😅

Author fireworksforum
Admin 
#13 | Posted: 26 Jul 2025 16:02 

Author US_Pyro_47
Member 
#14 | Posted: 27 Jul 2025 08:58 
I was vastly underwhelmed by the quality of this display. As a long-time pyrotechnician, I have always looked up to Montreal as the absolute pinnacle of pyromusical competitions. I felt Pyro Spec did the competition a disservice in regards to their display.

The timing was off throughout the show. There were an exorbitant amount of missed opportunities for next level designing especially with some of the better soundtrack choices. The lack of use of the entire site was befuddling. As Fred said, it felt more like watching a fireworks show WITH music instead of fireworks TO music. Best [American perspective] thought I had on this was that it felt like watching a big city 4th of July display rather than it being a world-class pyromusical.

The highlight of the show seemed to be a somewhat oddly fired ghost mine sequence. The quality of mines was spectacular <pun intended> but it felt as if the firing pattern was more to showcase the product than it was to compliment the overall design of the show. The persistence to rely on simple volleys of shells throughout the display left me unexcited personally.

As an experienced designer myself who just doesn't have a financial ability to compete in Montreal, I was a bit disappointed in the fact that a company that was given such an incredible opportunity, simply did what felt like the bare minimum. I hope Team France tonight shows what the spirit of Montreal really *should* look like. And maybe one day I will get the opportunity to showcase my own design abilities within La Ronde.

Author Smoke
Member 
#15 | Posted: 27 Jul 2025 13:53 
Another gusty evening was present for the American display, following the 40 km/h gusts that appeared during Swiss show a week prior. Thankfully, although still marginally near the 40 km/h threshold for this show after being reaching/exceeding 60 km/h earlier in the day, speeds decreased low enough consistently (30-35 km/h) to allow the show to be fired safely. Occasional lightning was also flickering to the distant NW with those dying thunderstorms before the show, and close to midnight, another small thunderstorm family successfully appeared around Valleyfield before dying away with East progression but leaving behind a decent rainfall that traversed the island shortly after midnight. For the fifth consecutive time, a Severe Thunderstorm Watch also made an appearance for a display day. Humidity was very high, along with a display temperature of 29 C, and the gusty SW winds allowed the smoke to drift quickly towards right-hand sections of the La Ronde audience (especially upper-level smoke).

This was an enjoyable display, and it was probably the most exciting for those who love repeated sequences of large shells! Indeed, the show literally resonated, and while it largely relied on this firing style, it came with some interesting sequences. The opening segment, for example, offered one of the most energetic openings we saw so far this year and did provide promise of what we could expect going forward with the display. There were some enjoyable low-level sequences that truly did mesmerize the audience, even though the connection to the music was often loose. We also were treated to good product quality, and at times, there was a nice blend between effects to provide a truly breathtaking atmosphere. The color richness was also shown nicely in this display, despite the very high humidity sometimes acting to dim the brightness.

Unfortunately, as everyone pointed out previously, the show was definitely missing tenacity, as much as I thoroughly enjoyed the awesome bursts of shells very regularly observed during this display. While I'm not a fan of the musical selection, the pyrotechnics themselves scarcely seemed to fit in with the rhythm and pacing characterizing the soundtrack. Apart from the fireworks, the music itself felt a bit too similar from one track to the other, limiting the ability to effectively elicit any kind of emotional direction using more delicate transitions. As such, the show lacked depth in terms of both its thematic illustration and its employed musical arrangement, even though the theme itself was the most consistently obvious one so far this year – the problem, though, is that this was only noticed through the music. Furthermore, there was a more reserved diversity of effects to emphasize key moments of songs, and oftentimes, there were hardly any pyrotechnics to support the fading of those songs. On the flip side, there were times where the fireworks would continue, making it unclear whether they belonged to the former segment or the newest one. As such, the conceptual design was not well established, as was the technical design. The finale appeared quite intense at first, but as with the theme this year, the finale was again cut short by being broken up and did not offer much more crescendo thereafter.

With the level of competition so unusually high this year, it is, unfortunately, difficult to envision the American show making an appearance on the podium this year. I think if the display carried more sequencing and filled in the often-empty spaces while following the music more intricately, I can see it being a much more serious contender. Sill, you never know what to expect!

Trav.

2025 Display Reviews Montreal Fireworks Forum / 2025 Display Reviews /
 United States — Pyro Spectaculars reviews

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

 

  ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 

 
Montreal Fireworks Forum Powered by Simple Bulletin Board miniBB ®


  ⇑