montreal-fireworks.com 2025 Schedule Report Blog

Montreal Fireworks Forum

 | Home | Register | Search | Statistics |
General Montreal Fireworks Forum / General /  
 

Firework factory explosion in Denmark

 
 
Page  Page 2 of 2:  « Previous  1  2

Author fireworks Li
Guest 
#16 | Posted: 1 Jan 2005 17:49 
Everything need take carefully, not only fireworks, if they can use fireworks carefully according to the labels, Do you think this kind thing would happened? Fireworks is an dangerous products, you need pay more attention to it, i think you can enjoy it if you can challenge yourself, do what you need to do to ban dangerous accidents.
Regards!

Liuyang Fireworks Li In China

Author Lars
Member 
#17 | Posted: 22 Jan 2005 02:17 
Since the season for consumer fireworks is now over, i thought it could be interessting for the visitors on the forum to have an update on how things went after the explosion we had in Denmark 3 months ago:

Regarding the damages:
- The damages has so far been calculated to exceed 175 million CAD.
- Around 200 homes were completely destroyed and has to be torn down and rebuild from scratch.
- It is estimated that it will take around 1-2 years before the neighborhood is back to the previous standard.

Regarding the consumer fireworks business:
- The largest consumer fireworks companies sales went down by 40% so i fear we will se at least one company close.
- 35% of the permissions to sell the fireworks were withdrawn due to tightening of the rules.
- Outside the sales places there used to be 2 x 20” containers. This year there only given permission for 1 x 10” container which had to be surrounded by a fence and guarded by a person.
- The distance from the door of the container to the nearest home was expanded from 20 to 40 meters.

The rules for storing is naturally also affecting the display fireworks ”business”. For instance we have 2 containers placed in the middle of nowhere – it’s almost as far away from civilisation that the tax authorities forget you . We have been forced to move some containers that pointed towards each other. The local head of the police department just commented that he agreed that it was absolutely nonsense and there was no apparent reason for doing so, since it’s hardly improving the safety.

I believe the restrictions were made so tight were also because we are having an election here in 2005. There is no rationale for changing the rules for sales places when it was a large warehouse in the middle of a neighborhood that exploded – The rest of the warehouses were not imidiately affected, but will be forced to move this year instead.

My current problem is that i’m a member of the political party, whos front figure tightened the rules

Lars

Author Smoke
Member 
#18 | Posted: 22 Jan 2005 08:41 
Lars,

Wow, I didn't know it caused so much destruction! I knew it would disrupt business and tighten up rules and restrictions, but that's quite a bit of money regarding damages, not to mention property damage.

Lars, where do you go from here? As a member of the political party, do you have any obligations regarding the situation?

Regards,

Trav.

Author Lars
Member 
#19 | Posted: 23 Jan 2005 02:40 
Hi Trav

I just want to add that i'm not an "active" and progressive member of a political party - just a member to support the oppionions, that's all. So in that way i will not do anything.

Besides all the factories have been protesting wildly so one voice more or less would not have any effect, i suppose. Aother problem is also that the union of firework distributors in denmark was very passive and not doing enough lobbying to stop the tightening of the rules... But i still doubt it would have had any effect...

And now for my final statement: This year NOBODY in denmark was injured because of a malfuntion or defect piece of fireworks. The accidents we saw were caused by idiots (!) who fired rockets into human-crowds and held all types of fireworks in the hand.
Therefore: What good is it to tighten the rules at the sales places when the warehouses are not affected and the consumers act irrisponsibly as soon as the champagne-corks are blown?!

Paul mentioned the term "ban idiotism"... Sadly, that would only be possible in the perfect world. Dont get me wrong, but i don't feel that sorry for drunk people who get injured acting stupid around fireworks in a maner that could inspire JackAss to new episodes... But I am deeply sorry for a 6-year old danish boy who was killed by a rocket lanched horizontally down a street, which unfortunately hit him in the chest and killed him instantly.

Anyways - I guess i'm lucky that the auditor-business is more stabile and safe

Best regards
Lars

Author Smoke
Member 
#20 | Posted: 23 Jan 2005 13:29 
Hi Lars,

Well, lets hope that nothing like this ever happens again. I'm still truly touched by this story and I'm happy that you can fill us in with the details.

Like I said before, it's the irony that fireworks is such a beautiful thing to admire and view with our own eyes, but at the same time it can be extremely fatal if tampered with or exposed to the wrong hands. This is the true nature of it. You must have the ability to control and the know-how to operate pyrotechnics. In fact, sometimes even people who are experienced with handling and working with fireworks and the whole ordeal, are sometimes the ones who can potentially get hurt, especially since they're exposed to chemicals and other hazardous compounds. My point is that things can also happen unsuspectedly. Although, in this situation, many homes and properties were damaged, it's clear that we can see the power of this accident.

As for "banning idiots," yes I agree. The ones who cause the accidents are the ones who are careless and have no cause for concern. This ideology would prove to be useful if one links all the care free people who hurt themselves when dealing with pyrotechnics. All I'm saying is that they brought it on themselves and should be blamed if it harmed other people in some way. I am also terribly sorry to hear that such a young boy was killed that way.

Anyways, I don't really want to pursue this topic too much because it sort of gets me down when I think about it. I'm also happy to hear that regulations and rules are tighter than ever, which they should always be!

BTW, Lars, any changes about you coming to Montreal this summer, or is that big assignment that you were telling Enkil and myself about, still in progress?

Regards,

Travis.

Author Lars
Member 
#21 | Posted: 30 Jan 2005 08:35 
Hi Smoke

Sorry for the late reply...

I pretty much agree in the points you have and it looks as if people posting on this topic all share the same viewpoint on accidents like this - which is a good thing...

And no, there won't be any change of my plans - so I won't be in Montreal this summer... Like i said i had to great summers and met some people i owe a lot for contributing so much to my vacations.

Instead i'm playing with the thought of going to the competition in Tarragona in Spain this summer. I's only a week and closer, so I still have enough time for my assignment.

Lars

Author Smoke
Member 
#22 | Posted: 30 Jan 2005 09:58 
That's great, Lars. I'm so happy to hear that things are turning out well for you in the long run.

Well, you could always read our thoughts on the shows.

I wish you all the best! And make sure that you check in with us more frequently.!

Regards,

Trav.

Page  Page 2 of 2:  « Previous  1  2 
General Montreal Fireworks Forum / General /
 Firework factory explosion in Denmark

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

 

  ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 

 
 
Montreal Fireworks Forum Powered by Simple Bulletin Board miniBB ®


  ⇑