montreal-fireworks.com 2025 Schedule Report Blog

Montreal Fireworks Forum

 | Home | Register | Search | Statistics |
2006 Display Reviews Montreal Fireworks Forum / 2006 Display Reviews /  
 

Macedo's Pirotecnia (Portugal) reviews.

 
 
Page  Page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next »

Author Enkil
Member 
#1 | Posted: 12 Jul 2006 23:39 
Post your reviews.

Author Smoke
Member 
#2 | Posted: 12 Jul 2006 23:44 
Hi guys,

Well, I just got in from a pretty decent display, though the weather took control of the entire thing, especially with the massive amounts of smoke accumulations. In fact, there were times when I couldn't even see La Ronde. The Easterly light winds also caused us to smell the smoke greatly at times.

In other news, this was, by far, the smallest crowd, for obvious reasons. The display itself was nicely done with some nice colors and effects, though often obscured by smoke, especially with some of lower effects and the frequent use of that bright red. It's a shame that the colors didn't come out as nicely. Synchronization was pretty much well done, especially with the entrance of gold fans at the left and right. However, there were parts that were quite slack.

The ending was lengthy, but not as enjoyable due to the smoke and possibly the lack of colors. However, it had alright length with plenty of noise.

The problem here was the general lack of wind and the abundant moisture and humidity, causing the smoke to build up. Thankfully enough, it did not rain, but it did come down a little steady up to 9:30 while some sprinkles just before the display. All in all, an excellent effort, but it's a pity that the smoke had to accumulate to such an extent. As a result, I did not get the chance to admire some of those dramtic colors and lower effects as much as I could have.

I'll have a full review tomorrow, that is, after I finish up South Africa's. What bad luck for the displays this year.

Regards,

Trav.

Author Enkil
Member 
#3 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 00:50 
Well, I'm afraid my review and opinion won't be as accurate as the previous ones I've done in the past...

I had a very bad night and my mood was not very good. Many good and bad things happened to me today (I know I'm very dialectical) so I really wasn't in the "fireworks" mood tonight.

In fact, I was very close to come late to the show, mainly because my sisters just couldn't make their mind up! It was 8:50pm and I was still at home trying to make a decision myself .

After all the fuss, finally, I arrived at Henri-Bourassa station at 9:10pm. I took the metro and off I went to Papineau station. It was 9:50pm when I set foot on Notre Dame street in stress and in frustration! But once again, the metro saved the day. Ouff!

And ironically, what a GREAT view I found. I think that one more time, I had the greastest view on Notre Dame street or outside of La Ronde! I was right behind a handicap, up front, next to the steel and in the middle of the ramps.

This was by far the most anticlimatic fireworks night ever. I mean almost everything went wrong: low attendance, smoke blowing in my direction, and... rock music?

The smoke, aside being delicious to smell (well, somewhat) didn't really obscure everything. I think it really depended on where you were standing. But I did recieve black powders in my eyes and probably in my hair also.

As for the show, I found this dispay to be quite intense compared to other shows we saw this year. I think this is because they used rock songs, so I guess it's normal. However, I do like certain rock songs (mostly vampire songs), but they choose a lot of boring ones in my taste. Many of them were very repetitive and LONG. I know their theme is about rock, but I really am not sure if it's a good theme...

However, this isn't much of a big criticism because I thought their display itself was wonderful. There were many intense and beautiful scenes! Yet at the same, I know that there were a lot of intense moments, but I also felt that they weren't enough to stir up my excitement. I'm pretty sure it was because of my mood, though.

Anyhow, synchronization was good at certain times, but not always perfect. I very much loved the quality and the content of the pieces, they had many good wonderful effects. They should have used more candles and added more fireworks in the low part because it seemed that they used most of the time a lot of shells, etc.

The anticipating finale was not as powerful and sublime as they mentioned in the press release. Worse, it wasn't even colorful! But I should also mention that we did see many feux finales.

It was definitely a unique approach, but it just felt very anticlimatic. In general, unfortunetaly I am just not sure how to rate this display and what to make out of it, but I do believe I witnessed a very good display.

I've tried very hard to forget all the problems and rate the display in the most fairest way I can because I just don't want my mood to affect it. So I figured that they deserve to be in second place.

1. South Africa
2. Portugal
3. Italy
4. Switzerland
5. Argentina

Rated from Notre-Dame street and may not be debatable with those who watched the displays from elsewhere without recognizing that my viewpoint is different from theirs.

Indeed, this has been a very cursed year, Smoke.

Author kamuro
Member 
#4 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 08:38 
It just dont get how you can write a review from outside of La Ronde...

the show is certainly "enjoyable" from Notre Dame or the bridge but you don't get to see any of the low level effects, wich are the ones that we spend the most time and efforts on, artistically-wise

Author passion
Member 
#5 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 09:22 
Salut les mordus en feu

J'ai regardé le feu juste au dessus du lac sur le Pont.Je n'ai rien manqué car il y avait beaucoup d,action sur le Lac et sur toutes les rampes autant verticalement qu'horizontalement...........
J'ai adoré ce feu ...Une performance solide ,un feu roulant dansant le rock partout sur le site,une prestation menée de main de maitre qui m'a envoûté du début à la fin. Pour emprunter l'expresssion de Paul marriot; " It was a fantastic display" par ces petits nouveaux qui ne voulaient pas manquer leur coup.
Un concept cohérent du début à la fin...une intensité et un rytme très bien dosé, de bonnes transitions, des surprises originales, de l'émotion, un excellent choix musical,un choix judicieux de belles pièces pyrotehniques avec des couleurs riches , une très bonne syncronisation , une mise en scène soignée, très dynamique qui a maintenu l'intérêt du spectateur.
En fait ces gens du Portugal m'ont embarqué dans leur train à la première minute et m'ont fait vivre un très beau voyage pyro-musical.Pour moi c'est toujours bon signe....
En résumé pour moi la meilleure prestation à date...........ces gens là se sont préparés pour Montréal avec beaucoup de soin..cà se voyait..Bravo le Portugal.
Mon classement à date

Portugal
Afrique du Sud
Argentine
Suisse
Italie

Bye tout le monde...Et...cà continue...

Roger

Author PyroDan
Member 
#6 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 09:50 
Hello friends,

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to watch the display. However, I did hear the music. The theme was not very original since any firm can choose a "rock" theme or dance, country, folk, ...etc. Anyways, I'm looking forward to Paul's review and any video would be appreciated.


Portugal:

Quality: N/A
Synchro: N/A
Design: N/A
Appreciation: N/A

Dan

Author Enkil
Member 
#7 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 13:02 
kamuro,

I've already said in the past that I do reviews and the rate the shows for myself, for those who watch it from Notre Dame street and also for those who wish to know my point of view from Notre Dame street.

You're thinking too objectively, and I don't want you to believe that my opinion can be mixed with those who watch it from La Ronde.

I've already explained this in the "Argentina (Cienfuegos) reviews." thread.

Generally, people on Notre Dame street can see the majority of the fireworks you guys see from La Ronde. I think we can all agree on the fact that most of the action happens in the sky and not always on the low level. I'm not exactly sure how high the low level is for you, but I certainly agree that we don't always see the effects that happen very near the ground.

But like I said, don't depend on me to have an accurate review, and I do recognize that my reviews are *unofficial* and I do them just for the fun of it. I am not professional (don't wish to be one for now), but only an amateur who watches fireworks displays outside of La Ronde and rate them from my perspective and from where I stand.

Let me know if or why you don't agree with me that I can share my point of view even though I agree that my reviews must not be compared with those who watch the displays from elsewhere without acknowledging that I watch the displays from Notre Dame.

Author fireworksforum
Admin 
#8 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 19:00 
As a former spectator from Notre Dame / de Lorimier I have to tell you that there's a lot of low-level action that is hard to see from there. Candles are OK, but the lower-level action and nautical shells are pretty much invisible. As displays have become increasingly sophisticated and use computer firing, more of the tightly synchronized action is at the low level. Last night's display was a case in point: it was probably visually the most tightly synchronized display so far this year. Yet the comments from people outside of La Ronde mentioned that the synchronization was slack in places.

All this said, I'm happy for people to review what they actually saw, no matter where they were located. For the spectators onsite at La Ronde last night, the weather conditions were perfect and we weren't troubled by any smoke at all - it was all directed at the bridge and Montreal shore! No wonder things were hard to see!

My review(s) will be up soon - once again I was away in California between last night's display and South Africa's. It has certainly been very hard to keep up with the competition and all the travelling I've been doing.

Paul.

Author Smoke
Member 
#9 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 19:39 
Hey guys,

My report for South Africa is finally up.

As for viewing points, well, I'm well aware of the lower portions of the display are "nearly" invisible to us from the opposite side of the river. As a result of this, I only comment based on my individual interpretations of what I saw at ground level, especially considering that the lower effects, 90% of the time, illuminate before us, so we can often interpretate what was being displayed. However, I cannot say extreme details based on those interpretations since I'm only assessing on what I saw. Though not in detail, I can certainly pinpoint when ground level effects and nautical effects are ready to be executed.

For synchronization, well, I didn't necessarily comment on the lower parts in terms of slackness, but rather with some of the mid to high level effects.

And I was pretty sure that you guys didn't have a smoke problem due to the wind direction, so it was fortunate enough for spectators over there. Plus, a lot of the lower effects, for us, were obscured by smoke, but we were still fortunate enough that we could see the colors and the effects at that position since they still managed to come through slightly to us.

I'll do my best to comment on these in my review, that is, based on what I saw.

Trav.

Author Salutes lover
Member 
#10 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 22:34 
Hi Everyone,



Roger.....moi aussi, je vais sur le pont juste au dessus du lac et on peut tout voir de là....autant l'activité haut dans les airs, que les feux juste au dessus du lac! En plus, en étant à proximité des feux, le délai entre l'explosion des feux et le bruit qu'ils émettent est très court, ce qui fait encore plus apprécier le spectacle!

Dan.....like you, I could not attend the Portugal display.....I had a hard and long day at work, so I finished later, then I had to go visit a friend at the hospital....and I was way too tired to go watch the fireworks, knowing that I had to rush to go downtown and then come back late and get up early the next morning

At 22:25, I got outside on my balcony and listened to the fireworks to try to find if I had missed a loud finale! ;-) Even though I live in Ahuntsic very close to the river (Des Prairies), I could hear the rockets explode very clearly.

Travis and Enkil.......please, let me know how the finale was and were there any salutes? How intense was the finale, compared to other displays?

I will write my comments about the South Africa display in the next few days.....which I really enjoyed. And hey.......Canada is next! Let's go Canada!!!

Talk to you later, my friends.

Pierre ;-)

Author Enkil
Member 
#11 | Posted: 13 Jul 2006 23:28 
Salutes lover,

The finale was in a essence intense, mainly because it was very noisy. However, I'm not sure if they were shooting kamuros, but they mostly looked like brown shells . It wasn't that bad, except personally I by far prefer to see a colorful and salute filled finale.

I think there were also salutes, but not as powerful as other countries. I'm not sure though.

Honestly, Salutes lover, I think you would have prefered the whole display over the finale, because their display itself was quite intense (and very good) since the theme was about Rock.

BTW, I'm not sure if you saw it yet, but a few weeks ago I posted the finale of IPON 2004, here's the link in case you missed it :
http://www.montreal-fireworks.com/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum =5&topic=570

It's true that you can see many of the bottom effects from the bridge if you stand right in front of La Ronde, except the angle sucks. That's why I prefer to watch it from Notre Dame street. I know it because I used to go where Passion goes (I think).

Author fredbastien
Member 
#12 | Posted: 14 Jul 2006 09:54 
I was really entertained by this first show of Macedo's Pirotecnia in Montreal! Despite some repetitive parts, the display was very interesting. Music choice creates a light theme and transitions from one part to the next were very quick. The show was also longer than usual (approx.: 32 minutes). In my opinion, synchronization was very good throughout the show and choice of pyrotechnic pieces was generally appropriate for the music.

As soon as the second minute of the show, I have been impressed by four large cakes of whizzer (two on each extremity of the third firing ramp), launching white pieces vertically for almost one minute. Talking with Carlos Macedo after the show for PyroPlanet.com (the interview should be online very soon), I learnt that each cake included more than 1200 whizzers! The third part, on the music of "I want it all" was terrific, ending with barrages of nautical shells. They produced a lot of smoke over the lake, however, but the designer has made the good choice to use only high-level pieces for the next segment, so we didn't miss any part of the show.

The show was a little repetitive. For instance, the first and third parts began exactly in the same way, that is, with flares along ramps 3 and 4. I believe also that some crossettes and go-getters have been used very often during the show. However, it was interesting to see go-getters again, since I think it was the first time this year. By the way, a fifth ramp has not been deployed yet, neither large setup pieces on firing ramps.

I am not sure that Macedo's Pirotecnia is going to win a Jupiter prize this year, but this first show in Montreal was very good.

Fred

Author fredbastien
Member 
#13 | Posted: 14 Jul 2006 23:28 
The interview with Carlos Macedo and a short article are now online:

http://www.pyroplanet.com/article306.html

Do not blame me again - Paul already did it - for the most important question which has not been asked, that is, how many cues?

Fred

Author Chris_2112
Member 
#14 | Posted: 16 Jul 2006 04:04 
Interesting display...I actually liked what I heard of the music...and thought they did a good job synchronising it with the fireworks. I was on the bridge, incidentally....it was really too bad there was so much smoke accumulation, because I could tell that the colours they used were really striking and rich - intermittently, you could see their full richness, but that smoke really dims things. Really unfortunate. A lot of my photos sucked for the same reason, but I also think that the smoke and light creates a kind of coloured haze that is interesting:

http://eps.mcgill.ca/~devries/fireworks3.htm

Cheers!

Author Salutes lover
Member 
#15 | Posted: 16 Jul 2006 20:25 
Enkil,

First of all, thanks for letting me know about the link to the IPON S.R.L. 2004 finale......you are right, I did not know about it, since you mentionned it in this thread! I left my comments in the "Surprise video dedicated to Pierre" thread! Man, you have made my day!

Thanks also for your answer about the Portugal's finale. This way, I don't feel I have missed too much in the way that there were more intense and filled with salutes finales in other displays. On the other hand, I am sure that I have missed an excellent display, judging by all of you guys' comments. I will not rank Portugal in my list of favorites so far this season, since I have not attended!

See you later!

Pierre

Page  Page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next » 
2006 Display Reviews Montreal Fireworks Forum / 2006 Display Reviews /
 Macedo's Pirotecnia (Portugal) reviews.

Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

 

  ?
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 

 
 
Montreal Fireworks Forum Powered by Simple Bulletin Board miniBB ®


  ⇑